On this tab, results for development partners, including countries and organisations, can be compared against averages for each type of partner. Select a development partner or average to start exploring.

1. SELECT YEAR


2. SELECT WHICH TYPE OF PARTNERS TO CONSIDER FOR COMPARISON (SELECT ONE OR MANY):

3. Select two development partners or type their names:

Partner
Partner
Average
Indicator 1a: Do development partners use countries' own results frameworks and evaluation processes?

% of use of country-owned results frameworks by providers of development co-operation (SDG 17.15.1)

- - -

% of new development interventions that draw objectives from country-led results frameworks

- - -

% of results indicators drawn from country-led results frameworks

- - -

% of results indicators monitored using the partner country's own sources

- - -

% of new interventions that plan a final evaluation with partner country involvement

- - -
Indicator 4: Are development partners making high-quality information on development co-operation publicly accessible?

Transparency assessment by the OECD Creditor Reporting System (CRS) - backward-looking data for accountability purposes

- - -

Transparency assessment by the OECD Forward Spending Survey (FSS) - data for forecasting purposes

- - -

Transparency assessment by the International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI) - data for aid management and planning purposes

- - -
Indicator 5a: Annual predictability of development co-operation
- - -
Indicator 5b: Medium-term predictability of development co-operation
- - -
Indicator 6: Development co-operation is on budgets which are subject to parliamentary scrutiny
- - -
Indicator 9b: Use of partner countries public financial management and procurement systems to deliver development co-operation
- - -
Indicator 10: Aid is untied
- - -